Might Scott Peterson obtain a brand new trial? A take a look at prices from his 2004 proceedings

In keeping with studies and specialists, the price of a brand new trial for convicted assassin Scott Peterson – if granted – might be substantial for taxpayers, who had already racked up a large $2.64 million invoice from 2004 court docket proceedings.

Scott Peterson, now 49, was in court docket with attorneys on Thursday as protection and prosecutors argued for a brand new trial for the 2002 murders of his spouse, Lacey Peterson, and their unborn son. After greater than five-and-a-half hours, the choose ended the day’s proceedings with each the events asking them to submit memorandums by mid-September, in the event that they so want. The jurist then has as much as 90 days to difficulty his determination.

However his ultimate determination might be expensive.

The Los Angeles Occasions cited Modesto B as saying that based on studies in early 2005, Peterson’s 2004 trial value the taxpayer $2.64 million, with $1 million stemming from the police investigation alone.

Scott Peterson’s attorneys argue for brand spanking new trial in homicide of spouse Lackie Peterson and unborn son

Peterson’s six-month homicide trial and three months of jury choice value greater than $700,000 — about $742,000 — for the San Mateo County Superior Court docket, the Related Press and Occasions reported.

In keeping with the Occasions, $672,507 prices from the Stanislaus County District Legal professional’s workplace are additionally included outdoors staff’ wages. After Peterson mentioned he could not afford it, the county reportedly paid $229,000 to certainly one of Peterson’s protection witnesses.

There may be a lot that should go to a take a look at of that nature.

– Ted Williams, former murder detective and famend lawyer

Peterson was convicted on 12 November 2004 and later sentenced to demise. However after a number of main developments over the previous a number of months, their fortunes have turned – and extra might change within the coming weeks.

Lackey Peterson disappeared 19 years in the past: Household on campaign for justice, unhappy case despatched to public

scott peterson mugshot photo

Photograph from Scott Peterson, California Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation on Might 11, 2018. (California Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation through AP, File/Related Press)

The California Supreme Court docket overturned Peterson’s demise sentence in 2020 and tasked Superior Court docket Choose Anne-Christine Masullo to resolve whether or not she acquired a good trial.

Good was an alternate jury member who joined the jury’s deliberations after the 2 unique jury members had been eliminated. The panel finally discovered Peterson responsible of first-degree homicide within the demise of his spouse and second-degree homicide of their unborn son. He was sentenced to demise in 2005.

Listening to on attainable trial of convicted assassin Scott Peterson in California delayed attributable to COVID publicity

Peterson’s attorneys argue that, amongst different issues, Good sought to hitch the jury as a result of she wished notoriety and monetary causes. He has additionally argued that he lied about his lack of bias to look on the jury, and lied once more in a sworn declaration in 2020.

Juror Rachel Nice

Rachel Good adjusts her hair as she speaks with the media of jurors on the Outdated San Mateo County Courthouse on December 13, 2004 in Redwood Metropolis, Calif. (AP picture/Low Dematis, File/Related Press)

Throughout the jury choice, Good reportedly didn’t disclose that she sought a restraining order whereas pregnant in 2000, saying she “really misplaced her unborn little one” due to threats from her boyfriend’s ex-girlfriend. afraid for”.

She mentioned in her sworn declaration 20 years later that she did not really feel “victimized” in the best way the regulation may outline that phrase.

And a former fellow juror testified in March that Good had come to the jury room throughout deliberations in 2004 and mentioned “that he ought to have principally paid for the homicide of the ‘little man’.”

Rachel Nice is celebrating

Juror Richelle Good, middle, hugs lawyer Gloria Allred after talking at a information convention following the formal sentencing of Scott Peterson on March 16, 2005 in Redwood Metropolis, California. (AP Photograph/Jeff Chiu, FILE/AP Newsroom)

Good beforehand testified that he held no prejudices in opposition to Peterson till he heard proof that he dumped his spouse’s physique within the San Francisco Bay on Christmas Eve.

Ted Williams, a well known lawyer and former murder detective, instructed Fox Information Digital on Thursday that he expects the prices on this case “to be monumental.”

“You not solely must cope with all of the proof, however you must cope with the witnesses,” mentioned Fox Information contributor Williams. “It’s important to cope with some safety, particularly in that courtroom. As a result of there are individuals who very a lot imagine that Scott Peterson murdered his spouse and little one.”

lackie peterson missing persons poster

A younger little one stops to view a brief memorial and a lacking individuals banner providing a $500,000 reward for the secure return of Lackey Peterson at East La Loma Park in Modesto, California, on January 4, 2003. (Justin Sullivan / Getty Photos / Getty Photos)

He continued: “There’s so much that must go right into a take a look at of that nature. And it might be a really, very costly take a look at.”

In court docket on Thursday, Choose Massullo argued that Peterson’s lawyer on the time might have requested follow-up inquiries to make clear a few of Good’s responses. She famous that there have been a number of discrepancies within the Potential Juror Questionnaire within the unique trial.

Scott Peterson sentenced to life in jail for killing spouse Lacey Peterson

Throughout his arguments in court docket, Peterson’s lawyer Cliff Gardner mentioned that Good contradicted himself in a number of statements, and later modified his solutions to some questions on his private experiences and emotions. She argued that she was inconsistent and uncooperative.

Gardner additionally mentioned that Good answered a query with a “no” and requested whether or not she might base her determination solely on proof offered in court docket, not outdoors or pre-existing opinions or views. From. Peterson’s lawyer on the time, who’s now not concerned within the case, didn’t observe up on the reply.

Gardner mentioned Good took steps to contact Peterson after pleading responsible.

“He gave Conner a nickname, referred to as him ‘Little Man,'” she instructed the court docket. ,He took the extraordinary step after he was convicted and sentenced Mr Peterson to demise, [of] Beginning correspondence with a sequence of letters. And the court docket has seen letters and letters. They every have totally different focus, however one focus of every letter is its “little man”.

In the meantime, David Harris of the Stanislaus County District Legal professional’s Workplace instructed the court docket that when requested why Good considers herself a “honest particular person,” she replied: “I do know what it is wish to be judged. “

The 23-page questionnaire contained 163 questions, and “she did the very best she might,” Harris mentioned.

Scott Peterson’s former protection lawyer presents new proof: ‘I actually imagine in Scott’s innocence’

Harris mentioned there is not any doubt that Good made errors, however that did not make him a liar.

“He’s inconsistent on his solutions,” he instructed the court docket. “However being incorrect doesn’t suggest he is a liar or makes him a liar. It might be that he is actually unhealthy at filling out types.”

Harris later mentioned: “Good generally confirmed she might be a bit confused about issues.”

Get Fox Enterprise on the go by clicking right here

The prosecutor additionally argued that Good was not mendacity when she answered “no” to the unique trial’s juror questionnaire about her involvement in any trial. He mentioned {that a} widespread man can misuse or misunderstand the authorized terminology.

Scott Peterson and Lacy Peterson

On this March 17, 2005, file picture, Scott Peterson is carried in a ready van by two San Mateo County Sheriff’s Deputies in Redwood Metropolis, Calif. ((AP Photograph/Justin Sullivan, FILE) / The Related Press)

Nevertheless, Peterson’s attorneys disputed Harris’ claims by presenting a transcript of Good, acknowledging that what she filed was a lawsuit.

Harris additional pointed to proof that police obtained in opposition to Peterson throughout the investigation into the deaths of Lackey and Conner.

Click on right here to learn extra about Fox Enterprise

“From the easy indisputable fact that Lackey and Connor, whose our bodies had been washed ashore 90 miles from their residence, however the place Peterson admitted that he had gone fishing the day he disappeared; Peterson requested him to had beforehand researched bay streams within the weeks earlier than disappearing; and fishing boat he purchased, however talked about [to] Nobody; Peterson’s incapability to elucidate what he was fishing in the course of the day; for her repeated, grim visits to the marina within the weeks following her disappearance; Within the weeks following his disappearance, he took a number of steps – promoting his automobile, looking out residence gross sales, turning the nursery right into a storage room – indicating that he already knew that Lacey and Connor would by no means return. had been,” Harris mentioned.

The Related Press contributed to this report.

Leave a Comment