Heard attorneys say juror served improperly, search mistrial


FAIRFAX, Va. (AP) — One of many jurors within the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard defamation trial served improperly, an lawyer for Heard alleged in a current submitting that requested the courtroom to declare a mistrial and order a brand new trial.

“Newly found details” present Juror No. 15 within the six-week trial was not the person summoned in April to serve within the case, Heard’s lawyer wrote in a five-page memo filed Friday in Virginia’s Fairfax Circuit Courtroom.

As a substitute, the submitting suggests Juror No. 15 was a youthful particular person with the identical final title who “apparently” lives on the similar tackle.

“Because the Courtroom little question agrees, it’s deeply troubling for a person not summoned for jury obligation nonetheless to look for jury obligation and serve on a jury, particularly in a case corresponding to this,” the submitting stated.

Depp sued his ex-wife over a December 2018 op-ed Heard wrote in The Washington Submit describing herself as “a public determine representing home abuse.” A lot of the testimony targeted on whether or not Heard had been bodily and sexually abused, as she claimed. Depp stated he by no means hit Heard and that she was the abuser.

After a televised trial that became a spectacle, the jury present in Depp’s favor on all three of his claims regarding particular statements within the 2018 piece.

The jury determined Depp ought to obtain $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages, however the decide decreased the punitive damages award to $350,000 underneath a state cap.

Heard has beforehand stated she plans to attraction the decision.

Information of Friday’s submitting was first reported by Deadline, which posted the doc on-line.

The memo expanded upon earlier post-trial motions filed by Heard’s authorized group that requested the decide to throw out the decision towards her. These motions had raised the likelihood that one of many jurors might not have been correctly vetted by the courtroom.

The newest submitting stated a “jury panel listing” within the case included an individual who would have been 77 on the time of the trial. Voter registration data lists two people with the identical final title “apparently” residing on the similar tackle, stated the submitting, through which the names had been redacted.

“The person who appeared for jury obligation with this title was clearly the youthful one. Thus, the 52-year-old … sitting on the jury for six weeks was by no means summoned for jury obligation on April 11,” violating Heard’s due course of rights, the submitting stated.

The Related Press despatched emails in search of remark Sunday to a consultant for Depp and two of his attorneys.

Copyright 2022 The Related Press. All rights reserved. This materials will not be printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed with out permission.



Supply hyperlink